SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE
SNAW.DE (iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SNAW.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Screened while ETLQ.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNAW.DE returned 13.25%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SNAW.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE.
Performance
SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SNAW.DE having a 10.75% return and ETLQ.DE slightly higher at 10.88%.
SNAW.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
ETLQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- —
SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAW.DE iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.75% | 7.91% | 27.45% | 22.43% | -15.24% | 33.21% | 6.88% | 24.92% |
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.88% | 8.14% | 26.10% | 20.83% | -13.64% | 32.63% | 5.63% | 24.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAW.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2019 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SNAW.DE and ETLQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SNAW.DE
ETLQ.DE
SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNAW.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 3.56 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 14.23 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAW.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.13 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.92 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.93 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, roughly equal to the maximum ETLQ.DE drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAW.DE and ETLQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAW.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -33.38% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -6.68% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.37% | -21.58% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.37% | -21.58% | -0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.34% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -4.33% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.68% | +0.27% |
Volatility
SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that SNAW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAW.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 2.68% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 7.77% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 11.18% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 14.06% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 15.74% | +1.42% |
SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SNAW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAW.DE nor ETLQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SNAW.DE and ETLQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ETLQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SNAW.DE.
SNAW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Screened, while ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SNAW.DE and 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for SNAW.DE and ETLQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer