PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) and iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAW.DE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than CBUH.DE's 22.41% return.


SNAW.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
3.93%
YTD
10.75%
6M
10.75%
1Y
24.24%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*

CBUH.DE

1D
-0.51%
1M
3.26%
YTD
22.41%
6M
23.42%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SNAW.DE
iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.75%7.91%27.45%22.43%-15.24%4.73%
CBUH.DE
iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
22.41%7.97%28.91%13.46%-17.00%0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAW.DE and CBUH.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2021

0.90

The correlation between SNAW.DE and CBUH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAW.DE
SNAW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SNAW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUH.DE
CBUH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CBUH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) and iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNAW.DECBUH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.38

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

13.99

-1.50

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the CBUH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAW.DE and CBUH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNAW.DECBUH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.99

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.64

+0.05

Drawdowns

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than CBUH.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAW.DE and CBUH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAW.DECBUH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-22.61%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

-9.39%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.37%

-22.61%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.51%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-8.55%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.27%

-0.32%

Volatility

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) is 2.85%, while iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that SNAW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAW.DECBUH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

4.80%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

13.32%

-4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

15.96%

-4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

16.91%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

16.91%

+0.25%

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUH.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAW.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAW.DE nor CBUH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAW.DE and CBUH.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SNAW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SNAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CBUH.DE.

SNAW.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while CBUH.DE is Momentum. SNAW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Screened, while CBUH.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SNAW.DE and 0.30% for CBUH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAW.DE and CBUH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer