SNAG vs. SSO
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SNAG tracks the Snap Inc. (SNAP) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SNAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
SNAG vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -74.30% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 16.14% return.
SNAG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- 6M
- -64.14%
- YTD
- -74.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $221.93K | $169.86K | $336.10K | |
| $177.82M | $191.16M | $223.05M |
SNAG vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -74.30% | 9.86% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 16.14% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and SSO is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
SNAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SSO
SNAG vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNAG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -84.67% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.21% | -4.07% | -74.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.79% | -19.45% | -40.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.54% | — |
Volatility
SNAG vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 116.18% | 25.63% | +90.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.18% | 33.88% | +82.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.18% | 35.91% | +80.27% |
SNAG vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAG vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
SNAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and SSO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for SNAG.
SNAG tracks Snap Inc. (SNAP), while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 0.87% for SSO.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer