SNAG vs. BEG
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. SNAG is passively managed, while BEG is actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
SNAG vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -54.52% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 562.24% return.
SNAG
- 1D
- 10.73%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -54.52%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -9.86%
- YTD
- 562.24%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNAG vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -54.52% | 11.30% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 562.24% | 15.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and BEG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAG | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 24.84 | -25.50 |
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -59.85% | -22.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.45% | -12.58% | -48.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.49% | -16.11% | -38.38% |
Volatility
SNAG vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.01% | 212.92% | -93.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 119.01% | 212.92% | -93.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 119.01% | 212.92% | -93.91% |
SNAG vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SNAG and BEG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
SNAG vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAG nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and BEG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG and BEG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
SNAG and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer