PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMVP.TO achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than XUSC.TO's 12.69% return.


SMVP.TO

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
4.89%
6M
4.40%
1Y
8.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XUSC.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
7.55%
YTD
12.69%
6M
10.97%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMVP.TO and XUSC.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMVP.TO
SMVP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SMVP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XUSC.TO
XUSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMVP.TOXUSC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.44

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

3.66

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

13.42

-9.89

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMVP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the XUSC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMVP.TO and XUSC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMVP.TOXUSC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.43

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.27

-0.89

Drawdowns

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, smaller than the maximum XUSC.TO drawdown of -18.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVP.TO and XUSC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMVP.TOXUSC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.11%

-18.31%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-7.60%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

0.00%

-5.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-2.67%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.07%

+0.62%

Volatility

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Volatility Comparison

HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) at 2.61%. This indicates that SMVP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUSC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMVP.TOXUSC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

2.61%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

8.51%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

11.46%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.16%

15.72%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.16%

15.72%

-2.56%

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMVP.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XUSC.TO's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMVP.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Dividend Comparison

SMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than XUSC.TO's 0.84% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMVP.TO and XUSC.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

SMVP.TO tracks Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index, while XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SMVP.TO and 0.12% for XUSC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMVP.TO and XUSC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer