SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO
SMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged)) and VUN.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SMVP.TO tracks the Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index while VUN.TO tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMVP.TO returned 8.93% vs 29.34% for VUN.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMVP.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for VUN.TO.
Performance
SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMVP.TO achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than VUN.TO's 12.43% return.
SMVP.TO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUN.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) | 4.89% | 1.65% |
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 12.43% | 8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMVP.TO and VUN.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SMVP.TO
VUN.TO
SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMVP.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.45 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 3.46 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 12.96 | -9.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMVP.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.47 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.01 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, smaller than the maximum VUN.TO drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVP.TO and VUN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMVP.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -28.19% | +16.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -8.51% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -0.39% | -5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -3.80% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.27% | +0.42% |
Volatility
SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO - Volatility Comparison
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) at 3.04%. This indicates that SMVP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMVP.TO | VUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.04% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 8.81% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 11.97% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 15.43% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 16.70% | -3.54% |
SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMVP.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VUN.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMVP.TO vs. VUN.TO - Dividend Comparison
SMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than VUN.TO's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) | 2.26% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 1.10% | 1.21% | 0.97% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMVP.TO and VUN.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for VUN.TO.
SMVP.TO tracks Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index, while VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index CAD. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SMVP.TO and 0.17% for VUN.TO.
Find the right allocation for SMVP.TO and VUN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer