SMVLX vs. LSVVX
SMVLX (Smead Value Fund) and LSVVX (LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SMVLX returned 12.68%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for LSVVX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SMVLX charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LSVVX.
Performance
SMVLX vs. LSVVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMVLX having a 21.13% return and LSVVX slightly lower at 20.59%. Over the past 10 years, SMVLX has outperformed LSVVX with an annualized return of 12.68%, while LSVVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.
SMVLX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- YTD
- 21.13%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.65%
LSVVX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
SMVLX Smead Value Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SMVLX vs. LSVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMVLX Smead Value Fund | 21.13% | 5.05% | 4.78% | 16.87% | -2.79% | 42.46% | 1.71% | 26.29% | -4.79% | 19.73% |
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund | 20.59% | 19.63% | 3.97% | 12.19% | -4.02% | 28.57% | -3.46% | 25.29% | -11.10% | 16.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMVLX and LSVVX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SMVLX and LSVVX has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMVLX vs. LSVVX — Risk / Return Rank
SMVLX
LSVVX
SMVLX vs. LSVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMVLX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.59 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 5.83 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.11 | 23.09 | -7.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMVLX vs. LSVVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMVLX drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, smaller than the maximum LSVVX drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVLX and LSVVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMVLX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.56% | -61.62% | +22.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -6.23% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.62% | -24.61% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.62% | -24.61% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.56% | -40.61% | +1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.76% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -12.10% | +7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.58% | +0.40% |
Volatility
SMVLX vs. LSVVX - Volatility Comparison
Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) at 2.68%. This indicates that SMVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMVLX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.68% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.42% | 8.14% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 11.22% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 15.84% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 18.42% | +1.01% |
SMVLX vs. LSVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMVLX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVVX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMVLX vs. LSVVX - Dividend Comparison
SMVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than LSVVX's 11.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund | 11.35% | 13.69% | 2.45% | 6.57% | 5.41% | 3.67% | 2.40% | 21.48% | 3.91% | 1.98% | 2.37% | 2.38% |
SMVLX Smead Value Fund | 1.38% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.34% | 1.78% | 3.91% | 1.40% | 3.83% | 7.47% | 0.22% | 3.14% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMVLX and LSVVX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMVLX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to LSVVX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMVLX dropped -39.56% vs LSVVX's -61.62%.
LSVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMVLX and LSVVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer