PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMUP vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF (SMUP) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMUP achieves a -56.52% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 39.90% return.


SMUP

1D
-5.76%
1M
-7.99%
YTD
-56.52%
6M
-84.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCZ

1D
5.56%
1M
60.49%
YTD
39.90%
6M
53.41%
1Y
60.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMUP and BTCZ is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025

-0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMUP vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMUP

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF (SMUP) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMUPBTCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

-0.55

+0.07

Drawdowns

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMUP drawdown since its inception was -98.64%, which is greater than BTCZ's maximum drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMUP and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMUPBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.64%

-91.06%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.14%

-77.44%

-20.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.25%

-73.73%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.76%

Volatility

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMUPBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.27%

87.54%

+115.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

203.27%

97.10%

+106.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.27%

97.10%

+106.17%

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

SMUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.96%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
SMUP
T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF
51.96%22.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMUP and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SMUP.

SMUP has the higher dividend yield at 51.96%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

SMUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SMUP and 0.95% for BTCZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMUP and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer