SMUP vs. BTCZ

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

SMUP (T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMUP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while BTCZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. SMUP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.

Performance

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF (SMUP) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMUP achieves a -77.45% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 32.07% return.

SMUP

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -21.61%
• 6M: -88.72%
• YTD: -77.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: -3.97%
• 6M: 42.20%
• YTD: 32.07%
• 1Y: 98.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMUP T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF	-77.45%	-95.38%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	32.07%	53.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SMUP and BTCZ is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	-0.48

Return for Risk

SMUP vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMUP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 36
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF (SMUP) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMUP	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.93	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.67	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.78	—

Drawdowns

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMUP drawdown since its inception was -99.09%, which is greater than BTCZ's maximum drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMUP and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMUP	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.09%	-91.06%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.03%	-78.70%	-20.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.87%	-73.75%	-7.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	21.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMUP	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	68.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	200.07%	89.07%	+111.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.07%	96.54%	+103.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.07%	96.54%	+103.53%

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMUP vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

SMUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.16%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%
SMUP T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF	100.16%	22.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMUP and BTCZ in my portfolio?

SMUP and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMUP or BTCZ?

On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMUP or BTCZ?

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SMUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMUP or BTCZ?

SMUP has the higher dividend yield at 100.16%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

What is the main difference between SMUP and BTCZ?

SMUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SMUP and 0.95% for BTCZ.