PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMT.L vs. WNRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMT.L is traded in GBp, while WNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WNRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMT.L achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SMT.L has outperformed WNRG.L with an annualized return of 17.21%, while WNRG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


SMT.L

1D
-3.58%
1M
-9.10%
6M
12.09%
YTD
14.83%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*
17.21%

WNRG.L

1D
1.10%
1M
3.20%
6M
21.06%
YTD
27.93%
1Y
37.02%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
21.10%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMT.L
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc
14.83%24.72%18.75%12.46%-45.71%10.46%110.49%24.76%4.00%40.09%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
27.93%6.65%3.85%-1.65%64.04%40.05%-32.40%5.71%-9.95%-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SMT.L and WNRG.L is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2009

0.34

The correlation between SMT.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMT.L
SMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

WNRG.L
WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMT.LWNRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.23

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

5.81

+0.64

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMT.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMT.L drawdown since its inception was -60.25%, roughly equal to the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMT.L and WNRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMT.LWNRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.25%

-59.34%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-16.52%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.05%

-21.66%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.11%

-22.11%

-38.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.11%

-59.34%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.85%

-10.03%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-12.66%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

6.35%

-2.06%

Volatility

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) at 6.42%. This indicates that SMT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMT.LWNRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

6.42%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.04%

18.68%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.89%

21.51%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.85%

23.88%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.82%

33.22%

-4.40%

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMT.L has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMT.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

SMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SMT.L
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc
0.34%0.37%0.44%0.51%0.51%0.26%0.27%0.54%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMT.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WNRG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for SMT.L.

They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for SMT.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMT.L and WNRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer