PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMT.L vs. VWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMT.L is traded in GBp, while VWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMT.L achieves a 27.32% return, which is significantly higher than VWRA.L's 12.10% return.


SMT.L

1D
-1.53%
1M
5.30%
YTD
27.32%
6M
42.05%
1Y
51.19%
3Y*
30.43%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
19.70%

VWRA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.31%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SMT.L
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc
27.32%24.72%18.75%12.46%-45.71%10.46%110.49%4.79%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
12.05%13.73%19.70%16.17%-8.37%19.58%12.78%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SMT.L and VWRA.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019

0.71

The correlation between SMT.L and VWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMT.L
SMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMT.LVWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.48

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

4.30

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

16.58

-2.49

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMT.L and VWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMT.LVWRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.52

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.89

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.76

-0.20

Drawdowns

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMT.L drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, which is greater than VWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMT.L and VWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMT.LVWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.61%

-25.64%

-36.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-6.93%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.05%

-18.10%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.11%

-18.10%

-42.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-0.40%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.03%

-3.46%

-12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

1.80%

+1.82%

Volatility

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) at 3.77%. This indicates that SMT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMT.LVWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.77%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

9.25%

+6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

11.83%

+8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.68%

14.06%

+15.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.76%

16.05%

+12.71%

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMT.L has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMT.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

SMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while VWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMT.L
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc
0.29%0.37%0.44%0.51%0.51%0.26%0.27%0.54%0.66%0.67%0.93%1.05%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMT.L and VWRA.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRA.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for SMT.L.

They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for SMT.L and 0.22% for VWRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMT.L and VWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer