SMT.L vs. FCSG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) and First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L).
SMT.L and FCSG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMT.L is an actively managed fund by Baillie Gifford Funds. It was launched on Mar 31, 2023. FCSG.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2021.
Performance
SMT.L vs. FCSG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMT.L vs. FCSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 6.11% | 24.72% | 18.75% | 12.46% | -45.71% | 18.36% |
FCSG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation | -3.29% | 3.93% | 11.42% | 6.17% | -3.68% | 23.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMT.L achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than FCSG.L's -3.29% return.
SMT.L
- 1D
- 5.67%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 32.93%
- 3Y*
- 23.47%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
FCSG.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- -1.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMT.L vs. FCSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMT.L has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSG.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMT.L vs. FCSG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMT.L
FCSG.L
SMT.L vs. FCSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) and First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMT.L | FCSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | -0.13 | +1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | -0.10 | +2.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.99 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | -0.17 | +2.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | -0.53 | +9.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMT.L | FCSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | -0.13 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.61 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.66 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMT.L and FCSG.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SMT.L vs. FCSG.L - Dividend Comparison
SMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while FCSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.05% |
FCSG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMT.L vs. FCSG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMT.L drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, which is greater than FCSG.L's maximum drawdown of -11.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMT.L and FCSG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMT.L | FCSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.61% | -11.39% | -51.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.50% | -7.80% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.11% | -11.39% | -48.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.77% | -6.49% | -10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -2.56% | -13.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 2.55% | +1.21% |
Volatility
SMT.L vs. FCSG.L - Volatility Comparison
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L) at 3.47%. This indicates that SMT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMT.L | FCSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 3.47% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.99% | 6.74% | +9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.36% | 11.31% | +11.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 10.73% | +19.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 10.73% | +17.95% |