SMST vs. ZIVB
SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. SMST charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
SMST vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMST
- 1D
- 17.75%
- 1M
- 49.84%
- YTD
- -55.68%
- 6M
- -41.65%
- 1Y
- 40.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | 19.01% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMST vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank
SMST
ZIVB
SMST vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMST | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMST | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SMST vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMST drawdown since its inception was -99.25%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMST and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMST | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.25% | 0.00% | -99.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.26% | 0.00% | -98.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.65% | 0.00% | -90.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.51% | — | — |
Volatility
SMST vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMST | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 125.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.31% | 0.00% | +140.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 166.64% | 0.00% | +166.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 166.64% | 0.00% | +166.64% |
SMST vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMST has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMST vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMST nor ZIVB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SMST is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMST is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
SMST and ZIVB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMST and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for SMST and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer