SMST vs. ZIVB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SMST charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.

Performance

SMST vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMST

• 1D: 9.85%
• 1M: 101.03%
• YTD: -32.44%
• 6M: -27.49%
• 1Y: 112.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZIVB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMST vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	87.61%
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	33.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SMST and ZIVB is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	-0.01

Return for Risk

SMST vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMST

SMST Risk / Return Rank: 30
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ZIVB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMST vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMST	ZIVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.63	—	—

Drawdowns

SMST vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMST drawdown since its inception was -99.25%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMST and ZIVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMST	ZIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.25%	0.00%	-99.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.35%	0.00%	-97.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.72%	0.00%	-90.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMST	ZIVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	42.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	128.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	144.30%	112.57%	+31.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	166.48%	112.57%	+53.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	166.48%	112.57%	+53.91%

SMST vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMST has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMST vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.

Position	TTM
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	0.00%
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMST and ZIVB in my portfolio?

SMST and ZIVB have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMST or ZIVB?

On fees, SMST is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMST or ZIVB?

SMST is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMST or ZIVB?

ZIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

What is the main difference between SMST and ZIVB?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMST and 1.35% for ZIVB.