PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMST vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMST vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMST achieves a -37.72% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 15.27% return.


SMST

1D
-3.03%
1M
2.28%
6M
-39.60%
YTD
-37.72%
1Y
121.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-83.81%

IWMY

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.31%
6M
10.17%
YTD
15.27%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$647.71K$735.48K$1.03M
$15.12M$14.46M$17.51M

SMST vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-37.72%-44.36%-91.71%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
15.27%10.18%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SMST and IWMY is -0.50, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMST vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMST vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMSTIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.87

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

6.07

-3.44

SMST vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMST Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMST and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMST vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMST drawdown since its inception was -99.25%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMST and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMSTIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.25%

-18.72%

-80.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.39%

-11.57%

-73.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.55%

-0.99%

-96.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.09%

-2.88%

-88.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.51%

3.56%

+42.95%

Volatility

SMST vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a higher volatility of 34.07% compared to Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) at 3.81%. This indicates that SMST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMSTIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.07%

3.81%

+30.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

134.96%

13.49%

+121.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.32%

16.34%

+133.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.60%

15.80%

+150.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

166.60%

15.80%

+150.80%

SMST vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMST has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMST vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.16%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
41.16%63.33%107.92%11.34%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMST and IWMY have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (34.07%) compared to IWMY (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMST dropped -99.25% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 121.46% vs 21.52% for IWMY. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 121.46% return vs 21.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWMY is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 41.16%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

SMST is categorized as Inverse Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMST and 1.05% for IWMY.

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMST and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer