PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMST.L vs. SOXL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP (SMST.L) and Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMST.L is traded in GBP, while SOXL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SOXL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMST.L achieves a -67.74% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL.L's 802.02% return.


SMST.L

1D
5.07%
1M
144.67%
YTD
-67.74%
6M
-49.77%
1Y
56.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXL.L

1D
-9.76%
1M
110.23%
YTD
802.02%
6M
716.77%
1Y
2,211.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMST.L
Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP
-67.74%9,160.39%-98.46%
SOXL.L
Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
802.02%3.47%-31.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SMST.L and SOXL.L is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMST.L
SMST.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SMST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXL.L
SOXL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP (SMST.L) and Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMST.LSOXL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.63

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

43.15

-42.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

128.87

-127.70

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMST.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the SOXL.L Sharpe Ratio of 16.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMST.L and SOXL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMST.LSOXL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

16.20

-15.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.61

-0.61

Drawdowns

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXL.L drawdown of -95.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMST.L and SOXL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMST.LSOXL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.26%

-95.81%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.24%

-50.58%

-42.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.93%

-9.76%

-82.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.49%

-61.38%

-19.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.05%

16.97%

+31.08%

Volatility

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP (SMST.L) and Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L) have volatilities of 55.39% and 56.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMST.LSOXL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.39%

56.90%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

177.15%

103.24%

+73.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.45%

134.86%

+68.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19,133.00%

136.53%

+18,996.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19,133.00%

136.53%

+18,996.47%

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMST.L and SOXL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

SMST.L vs. SOXL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMST.L nor SOXL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SMST.L and SOXL.L have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMST.L and SOXL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

SMST.L is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SOXL.L is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMST.L and SOXL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer