SMST.L vs. ORCS
SMST.L (Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP) and ORCS (Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMST.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ORCS.
Performance
SMST.L vs. ORCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMST.L is traded in GBP, while ORCS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ORCS values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMST.L achieves a -53.68% return, which is significantly lower than ORCS's 30.31% return.
SMST.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 43.51%
- 6M
- -31.54%
- YTD
- -53.68%
- 1Y
- 333.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORCS
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 40.25%
- 6M
- 27.68%
- YTD
- 30.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST.L vs. ORCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMST.L Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP | -53.68% | 91.88% |
ORCS Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF | 30.31% | 7.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMST.L and ORCS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMST.L vs. ORCS — Risk / Return Rank
SMST.L
ORCS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMST.L vs. ORCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP (SMST.L) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMST.L | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMST.L vs. ORCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMST.L drawdown since its inception was -97.98%, which is greater than ORCS's maximum drawdown of -49.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMST.L and ORCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMST.L | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.98% | -49.98% | -48.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.42% | -6.38% | -82.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.31% | -15.95% | -65.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.75% | — | — |
Volatility
SMST.L vs. ORCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMST.L | ORCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 76.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 189.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 225.47% | 61.51% | +163.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27,708.02% | 61.51% | +27,646.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27,708.02% | 61.51% | +27,646.51% |
SMST.L vs. ORCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMST.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ORCS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMST.L vs. ORCS - Dividend Comparison
SMST.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ORCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ORCS Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF | 1.10% | 0.26% |
SMST.L Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMST.L and ORCS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMST.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMST.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ORCS.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SMST.L and 0.97% for ORCS.
Find the right allocation for SMST.L and ORCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer