PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMSNX vs. HGIYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMSNX vs. HGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SMSNX) and Hartford Core Equity Fund (HGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSNX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than HGIYX's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSNX has underperformed HGIYX with an annualized return of 3.36%, while HGIYX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.


SMSNX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.21%
YTD
0.40%
6M
1.17%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
3.36%

HGIYX

1D
0.03%
1M
3.84%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.40%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMSNX vs. HGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMSNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund
0.40%13.62%4.17%12.59%-13.20%-4.23%2.56%11.52%-7.05%13.73%
HGIYX
Hartford Core Equity Fund
8.56%14.67%25.87%21.45%-18.68%24.53%18.42%36.27%-1.66%22.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SMSNX and HGIYX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.36

The correlation between SMSNX and HGIYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (10 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMSNX vs. HGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMSNX
SMSNX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SMSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

HGIYX
HGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMSNX vs. HGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SMSNX) and Hartford Core Equity Fund (HGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMSNXHGIYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

2.05

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

2.86

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.37

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.63

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.99

12.57

-6.58

SMSNX vs. HGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the HGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSNX and HGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMSNXHGIYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.05

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.73

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.83

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Drawdowns

SMSNX vs. HGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSNX drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum HGIYX drawdown of -51.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSNX and HGIYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMSNXHGIYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-51.88%

+26.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-8.93%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.77%

-17.10%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-24.64%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.77%

-33.47%

+7.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

0.00%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-10.13%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.86%

+0.07%

Volatility

SMSNX vs. HGIYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SMSNX) is 1.63%, while Hartford Core Equity Fund (HGIYX) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that SMSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMSNXHGIYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

2.69%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

8.84%

-4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.94%

11.44%

-6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

16.33%

-10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.51%

17.41%

-10.90%

SMSNX vs. HGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMSNX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than HGIYX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMSNX vs. HGIYX - Dividend Comparison

SMSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, less than HGIYX's 10.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGIYX
Hartford Core Equity Fund
10.75%11.67%8.93%2.99%4.02%3.18%0.75%4.39%5.62%3.75%1.62%2.10%
SMSNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund
5.33%5.36%4.90%6.53%5.85%4.68%5.07%5.27%5.74%7.37%4.78%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMSNX and HGIYX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGIYX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to SMSNX (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMSNX dropped -25.77% vs HGIYX's -51.88%.

SMSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMSNX and HGIYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer