SMRSX vs. SWSBX
SMRSX (ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund) and SWSBX (Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, SMRSX returned 2.19%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for SWSBX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMRSX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SWSBX.
Performance
SMRSX vs. SWSBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMRSX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than SWSBX's 0.34% return.
SMRSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SWSBX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.28%
- 10Y*
- —
SMRSX vs. SWSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMRSX ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.65% | 5.38% | 4.50% | 4.73% | -3.47% | -0.39% | 6.27% | 4.13% | 0.87% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 0.34% | 6.06% | 3.42% | 3.95% | -5.89% | -1.28% | 4.47% | 4.96% | 1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMRSX and SWSBX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between SMRSX and SWSBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMRSX vs. SWSBX — Risk / Return Rank
SMRSX
SWSBX
SMRSX vs. SWSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund (SMRSX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMRSX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | 1.59 | +1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.36 | 2.68 | +1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.33 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 2.68 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.76 | 8.79 | +7.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMRSX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 1.59 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.30 | 0.43 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.77 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
SMRSX vs. SWSBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMRSX drawdown since its inception was -5.62%, smaller than the maximum SWSBX drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMRSX and SWSBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMRSX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -9.06% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -1.54% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.95% | -1.79% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.62% | -9.06% | +3.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.63% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -1.80% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.47% | -0.24% |
Volatility
SMRSX vs. SWSBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund (SMRSX) is 0.45%, while Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that SMRSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMRSX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | 0.70% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | 1.63% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37% | 2.23% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.69% | 2.99% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.59% | 2.47% | -0.88% |
SMRSX vs. SWSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMRSX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSBX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMRSX vs. SWSBX - Dividend Comparison
SMRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than SWSBX's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMRSX ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.87% | 3.95% | 4.11% | 3.50% | 0.84% | 0.56% | 1.92% | 2.86% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 4.13% | 4.09% | 3.66% | 2.36% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 1.82% | 2.41% | 2.12% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMRSX and SWSBX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWSBX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to SMRSX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMRSX dropped -5.62% vs SWSBX's -9.06%.
SMRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMRSX and SWSBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer