PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMQ vs. ZIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMQ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 1X Short Innovation 100 Monthly ETF (SMQ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMQ

1D
0.00%
1M
3.71%
YTD
-15.29%
6M
-13.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZIVB

1D
0.00%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMQ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMQ and ZIVB is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMQ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1X Short Innovation 100 Monthly ETF (SMQ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMQ vs. ZIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMQ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMQ drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMQ and ZIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMQZIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.62%

0.00%

-27.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.22%

0.00%

-23.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.95%

0.00%

-8.95%

Volatility

SMQ vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMQZIVBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.29%

106.85%

-88.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

106.85%

-88.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

106.85%

-88.56%

SMQ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMQ has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMQ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

SMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than ZIVB's 2.37% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMQ and ZIVB have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZIVB is cheaper at 1.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZIVB is cheaper with a 1.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SMQ.

SMQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.90%, compared with 2.37% for ZIVB.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SMQ and 1.35% for ZIVB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMQ and ZIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer