PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOX vs. ETHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOX vs. ETHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOX achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly lower than ETHO's 21.47% return.


SMOX

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.21%
6M
12.84%
YTD
19.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHO

1D
-0.80%
1M
3.93%
6M
15.83%
YTD
21.47%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOX vs. ETHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMOX and ETHO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.88

SMOX vs. ETHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMOX
ETHO

Industrials

21.3%
15.9%

Financial Services

13.1%
12.2%

Technology

12.0%
28.7%

Healthcare

8.8%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
10.2%

Real Estate

6.8%
6.3%

Energy

5.9%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.4%

Basic Materials

3.4%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.0%
4.3%

Utilities

1.0%
2.5%

Industrials

SMOX
21.3%
ETHO
15.9%

Financial Services

SMOX
13.1%
ETHO
12.2%

Technology

SMOX
12.0%
ETHO
28.7%

Healthcare

SMOX
8.8%
ETHO
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SMOX
8.6%
ETHO
10.2%

Real Estate

SMOX
6.8%
ETHO
6.3%

Energy

SMOX
5.9%
ETHO
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

SMOX
4.2%
ETHO
4.4%

Basic Materials

SMOX
3.4%
ETHO
2.9%

Communication Services

SMOX
2.0%
ETHO
4.3%

Utilities

SMOX
1.0%
ETHO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOX vs. ETHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ETHO
ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOX vs. ETHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMOXETHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.37

SMOX vs. ETHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMOX vs. ETHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOX drawdown since its inception was -7.76%, smaller than the maximum ETHO drawdown of -25.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOX and ETHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOXETHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-25.50%

+17.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.61%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-4.33%

+2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

Volatility

SMOX vs. ETHO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOXETHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

17.72%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

19.34%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

19.34%

-4.21%

SMOX vs. ETHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOX vs. ETHO - Dividend Comparison

SMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than ETHO's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ETHO
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
0.70%0.86%0.69%
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
0.07%0.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOX and ETHO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SMOX.

ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.07% for SMOX.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SMOX and 0.45% for ETHO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOX and ETHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer