PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLPX vs. FSTEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLPX vs. FSTEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (SMLPX) and Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLPX achieves a 20.75% return, which is significantly lower than FSTEX's 31.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLPX has outperformed FSTEX with an annualized return of 9.40%, while FSTEX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.


SMLPX

1D
1.74%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
20.75%
6M
19.71%
1Y
22.40%
3Y*
24.91%
5Y*
17.34%
10Y*
9.40%

FSTEX

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
31.93%
6M
29.06%
1Y
45.47%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
21.23%
10Y*
6.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLPX vs. FSTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLPX
Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund
20.75%5.22%37.87%14.06%14.69%22.69%-17.25%16.36%-18.10%-6.80%
FSTEX
Invesco Energy Fund
31.93%12.31%6.00%0.28%52.85%55.99%-32.13%4.78%-26.82%-8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLPX and FSTEX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2012

0.77

The correlation between SMLPX and FSTEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLPX vs. FSTEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLPX
SMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTEX
FSTEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FSTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLPX vs. FSTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (SMLPX) and Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLPXFSTEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

4.59

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.26

14.62

-5.37

SMLPX vs. FSTEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the FSTEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLPX and FSTEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLPXFSTEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.50

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.85

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.24

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.26

+0.01

Drawdowns

SMLPX vs. FSTEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLPX drawdown since its inception was -73.06%, smaller than the maximum FSTEX drawdown of -83.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLPX and FSTEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLPXFSTEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.06%

-83.31%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-10.30%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.59%

-18.58%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.32%

-26.88%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.49%

-73.41%

+12.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-5.51%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-25.20%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

3.22%

-0.67%

Volatility

SMLPX vs. FSTEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (SMLPX) is 5.71%, while Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that SMLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLPXFSTEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

7.70%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

15.35%

-4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

19.02%

-5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.03%

25.15%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.16%

29.73%

-5.57%

SMLPX vs. FSTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLPX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTEX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLPX vs. FSTEX - Dividend Comparison

SMLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than FSTEX's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTEX
Invesco Energy Fund
1.68%2.22%4.03%2.11%0.89%1.80%2.21%1.53%3.05%2.22%1.10%1.58%
SMLPX
Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund
3.76%4.45%4.48%5.75%2.19%3.69%5.82%4.54%6.21%6.09%6.31%8.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLPX and FSTEX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTEX has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to SMLPX (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLPX dropped -73.06% vs FSTEX's -83.31%.

FSTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLPX and FSTEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer