PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Acc (SMLP.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMLP.DE is traded in EUR, while VFEG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VFEG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLP.DE achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly higher than VFEG.L's 12.73% return.


SMLP.DE

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.55%
YTD
21.07%
6M
14.97%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
18.35%
10Y*
6.71%

VFEG.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
2.35%
YTD
12.73%
6M
13.42%
1Y
27.19%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SMLP.DE
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Acc
21.07%-9.11%28.88%15.48%39.72%46.65%-37.48%-6.51%
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
12.73%11.04%19.64%3.42%-12.04%6.50%5.23%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLP.DE and VFEG.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.26

The correlation between SMLP.DE and VFEG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLP.DE
SMLP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VFEG.L
VFEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Acc (SMLP.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLP.DEVFEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

3.12

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

10.31

-7.11

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLP.DE and VFEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLP.DEVFEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.87

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.38

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.44

-0.35

Drawdowns

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLP.DE drawdown since its inception was -79.34%, which is greater than VFEG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLP.DE and VFEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLP.DEVFEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.34%

-31.43%

-47.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.62%

-8.68%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-17.33%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-19.97%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-1.57%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.61%

-8.50%

-17.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

2.63%

+1.62%

Volatility

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Acc (SMLP.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLP.DEVFEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

5.20%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

11.39%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

14.49%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.44%

15.73%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.59%

18.07%

+10.52%

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLP.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VFEG.L's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLP.DE vs. VFEG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMLP.DE nor VFEG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLP.DE and VFEG.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFEG.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFEG.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SMLP.DE.

SMLP.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while VFEG.L is Emerging Markets Equities. SMLP.DE tracks Morningstar MLP Composite, while VFEG.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SMLP.DE and 0.22% for VFEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLP.DE and VFEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer