PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) and SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (ZPDJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLN.DE achieves a 15.87% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDJ.DE's 16.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMLN.DE having a 8.93% annualized return and ZPDJ.DE not far ahead at 9.18%.


SMLN.DE

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.75%
YTD
15.87%
6M
15.93%
1Y
28.29%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
8.93%

ZPDJ.DE

1D
-0.45%
1M
6.00%
YTD
16.79%
6M
16.66%
1Y
30.67%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
9.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLN.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF
15.87%12.69%12.93%16.15%-11.17%8.51%4.78%22.29%-10.60%9.59%
ZPDJ.DE
SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
16.79%12.60%13.75%16.51%-12.51%9.97%5.16%21.83%-9.81%9.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLN.DE and ZPDJ.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2015

0.99

The correlation between SMLN.DE and ZPDJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLN.DE
SMLN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMLN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDJ.DE
ZPDJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ZPDJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) and SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (ZPDJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLN.DEZPDJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.06

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.93

9.86

+0.07

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the ZPDJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLN.DE and ZPDJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLN.DEZPDJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.64

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.60

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.56

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.44

+0.07

Drawdowns

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLN.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPDJ.DE drawdown of -28.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLN.DE and ZPDJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLN.DEZPDJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.42%

-28.06%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-9.98%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.55%

-16.90%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-19.10%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.42%

-28.06%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.45%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-5.93%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.10%

-0.26%

Volatility

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) and SPDR MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (ZPDJ.DE) have volatilities of 3.44% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLN.DEZPDJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

3.60%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.75%

14.86%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

18.62%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

16.57%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.40%

-0.18%

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLN.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMLN.DE nor ZPDJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SMLN.DE and ZPDJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZPDJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SMLN.DE.

SMLN.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei 400, while ZPDJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SMLN.DE and 0.12% for ZPDJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLN.DE and ZPDJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer