SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMLN.DE (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF) and FWIA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLN.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the JPX-Nikkei 400, while FWIA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMLN.DE returned 28.29% vs 26.57% for FWIA.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMLN.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWIA.DE.

Performance

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLN.DE achieves a 15.87% return, which is significantly higher than FWIA.DE's 12.60% return.

SMLN.DE

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 4.75%
• YTD: 15.87%
• 6M: 15.93%
• 1Y: 28.29%
• 3Y*: 14.96%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: 8.93%

FWIA.DE

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 13.33%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMLN.DE Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF	15.87%	12.69%	12.93%	4.66%
FWIA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	12.60%	9.02%	24.70%	7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLN.DE and FWIA.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.61

The correlation between SMLN.DE and FWIA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLN.DE

SMLN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 52
SMLN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SMLN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SMLN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SMLN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SMLN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FWIA.DE

FWIA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FWIA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FWIA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FWIA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FWIA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMLN.DE	FWIA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	2.36	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	3.31	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.44	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	4.08	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	16.52	-6.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLN.DE and FWIA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMLN.DE	FWIA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	2.36	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.40	-0.89

Drawdowns

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLN.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, which is greater than FWIA.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLN.DE and FWIA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMLN.DE	FWIA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.42%	-20.96%	-7.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-6.49%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.62%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-2.44%	-3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	1.60%	+1.24%

Volatility

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) at 2.96%. This indicates that SMLN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWIA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMLN.DE	FWIA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	2.96%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.75%	8.09%	+6.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.07%	11.22%	+6.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.12%	13.18%	+2.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.22%	13.18%	+3.04%

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLN.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FWIA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SMLN.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMLN.DE nor FWIA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMLN.DE and FWIA.DE in my portfolio?

SMLN.DE and FWIA.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMLN.DE or FWIA.DE?

On fees, FWIA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMLN.DE or FWIA.DE?

FWIA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SMLN.DE.

What is the main difference between SMLN.DE and FWIA.DE?

SMLN.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while FWIA.DE is Global Equities. SMLN.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei 400, while FWIA.DE tracks FTSE All-World. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SMLN.DE and 0.15% for FWIA.DE.