PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLL vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLL vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLL achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.


SMLL

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.12%
YTD
3.28%
6M
0.86%
1Y
1.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLL vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMLL
Harbor Active Small Cap ETF
3.28%-6.31%11.18%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.99%5.66%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLL and IBID is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLL vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLL
SMLL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SMLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLL vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLLIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.75

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

8.22

-8.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.17

30.99

-30.83

SMLL vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLL and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLL vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLL drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLL and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLLIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.56%

-1.28%

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.53%

-0.49%

-15.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.22%

-0.49%

-9.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-0.22%

-8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.72%

0.13%

+7.59%

Volatility

SMLL vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that SMLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLLIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

0.35%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

0.86%

+11.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

1.23%

+16.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

2.24%

+18.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.27%

2.24%

+18.03%

SMLL vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLL has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLL vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

SMLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%
SMLL
Harbor Active Small Cap ETF
2.29%2.37%0.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLL and IBID have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLL has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLL dropped -23.56% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 4.04% vs 1.28% for SMLL. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 4.04% return vs 1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SMLL.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.29% for SMLL.

SMLL is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SMLL and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLL and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer