PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (SMLK.DE) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMLK.DE having a 23.26% return and ETLZ.DE slightly lower at 23.04%.


SMLK.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.68%
6M
15.39%
YTD
23.26%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*

ETLZ.DE

1D
0.74%
1M
3.46%
6M
14.71%
YTD
23.04%
1Y
39.69%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SMLK.DE
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A
23.26%-4.02%13.30%13.97%-11.83%12.81%
ETLZ.DE
L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc
23.04%0.32%15.12%16.03%-14.22%10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLK.DE and ETLZ.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021

0.97

The correlation between SMLK.DE and ETLZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLK.DE
SMLK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SMLK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ETLZ.DE
ETLZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ETLZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (SMLK.DE) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLK.DEETLZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

5.61

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

16.79

-12.19

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the ETLZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLK.DE and ETLZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLK.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum ETLZ.DE drawdown of -58.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLK.DE and ETLZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLK.DEETLZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.69%

-58.36%

+25.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.60%

-7.04%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.69%

-31.34%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.69%

-31.34%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-0.92%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-10.71%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

2.35%

+5.95%

Volatility

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (SMLK.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE) at 4.19%. This indicates that SMLK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLK.DEETLZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.19%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

11.21%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.05%

16.56%

+11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.44%

19.97%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

21.00%

+1.21%

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLK.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ETLZ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLK.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMLK.DE nor ETLZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SMLK.DE and ETLZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SMLK.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMLK.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ETLZ.DE.

SMLK.DE tracks S&P SmallCap 600, while ETLZ.DE tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for SMLK.DE and 0.30% for ETLZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLK.DE and ETLZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer