SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE
SMLD.DE (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist) and LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) are both Energy Equities funds - SMLD.DE tracks the Morningstar MLP Composite while LYM9.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMLD.DE returned 15.33%/yr vs 11.14%/yr for LYM9.DE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMLD.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LYM9.DE.
Performance
SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLD.DE achieves a 20.75% return, which is significantly lower than LYM9.DE's 37.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLD.DE has outperformed LYM9.DE with an annualized return of 15.33%, while LYM9.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.14% annualized return.
SMLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 20.75%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 13.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 25.24%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
LYM9.DE
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 37.66%
- 1Y
- 74.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLD.DE Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist | 20.75% | -8.86% | 35.22% | 27.59% | 49.18% | 62.11% | -27.45% | 24.27% | -4.73% | -12.47% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 37.23% | 29.63% | -7.97% | -21.17% | -13.14% | 1.12% | 46.11% | 50.04% | -9.16% | 15.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLD.DE and LYM9.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2013 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SMLD.DE and LYM9.DE has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SMLD.DE
LYM9.DE
SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLD.DE | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.59 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 9.45 | -8.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 31.90 | -29.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLD.DE | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 3.65 | -3.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.16 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.51 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.05 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.78%, roughly equal to the maximum LYM9.DE drawdown of -72.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLD.DE and LYM9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLD.DE | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.78% | -72.01% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.77% | -7.81% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.99% | -41.61% | +18.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -55.00% | +32.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.79% | -55.00% | -15.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -2.77% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.76% | -42.85% | +25.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 2.32% | +4.84% |
Volatility
SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE) is 5.38%, while Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that SMLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYM9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLD.DE | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 7.97% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 15.84% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.64% | 20.25% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 22.20% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.70% | 21.82% | +12.88% |
SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLD.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LYM9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLD.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Dividend Comparison
SMLD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than LYM9.DE's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 0.31% | 0.42% | 0.74% | 0.78% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.70% | 1.12% | 0.67% | 0.89% | 1.50% | 2.23% |
SMLD.DE Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist | 7.55% | 8.45% | 12.45% | 18.33% | 14.40% | 17.94% | 25.01% | 18.21% | 21.61% | 18.39% | 14.39% | 20.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLD.DE and LYM9.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMLD.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
SMLD.DE tracks Morningstar MLP Composite, while LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SMLD.DE and 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
Find the right allocation for SMLD.DE and LYM9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer