PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L) and Safran SA (SAF.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMIN.L is traded in GBp, while SAF.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SAF.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIN.L achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly higher than SAF.PA's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIN.L has underperformed SAF.PA with an annualized return of 11.29%, while SAF.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 19.56% annualized return.


SMIN.L

1D
1.78%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
7.61%
6M
2.97%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
11.29%

SAF.PA

1D
2.34%
1M
11.77%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.29%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
31.43%
5Y*
20.95%
10Y*
19.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMIN.L
Smiths Group PLC
7.61%39.71%0.12%13.23%3.97%7.69%-8.47%27.37%-5.41%8.15%
SAF.PA
Safran SA
1.36%49.39%28.26%34.97%14.79%-12.35%-11.00%25.05%25.90%32.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIN.L and SAF.PA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIN.L
SMIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SMIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SAF.PA
SAF.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L) and Safran SA (SAF.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMIN.LSAF.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.71

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

1.93

+0.65

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIN.L and SAF.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMIN.LSAF.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.56

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.73

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.59

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.56

-0.27

Drawdowns

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIN.L drawdown since its inception was -60.05%, roughly equal to the maximum SAF.PA drawdown of -61.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN.L and SAF.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMIN.LSAF.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.05%

-61.23%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.87%

-24.45%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-24.45%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-29.70%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.96%

-61.23%

+7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-13.34%

+5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-11.85%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

8.98%

-3.09%

Volatility

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L) is 6.88%, while Safran SA (SAF.PA) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that SMIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAF.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMIN.LSAF.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

9.88%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.37%

27.33%

-6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.20%

31.08%

-8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

28.22%

-5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

32.44%

-6.56%

Dividends

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA - Dividend Comparison

SMIN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than SAF.PA's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAF.PA
Safran SA
1.12%0.98%1.04%0.85%0.43%0.40%0.00%1.32%1.53%0.97%2.15%1.96%
SMIN.L
Smiths Group PLC
1.86%1.96%2.55%2.36%2.48%2.39%2.33%2.72%3.27%2.90%2.97%4.36%

Financials

SMIN.L vs. SAF.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smiths Group PLC and Safran SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SMIN.L values in GBp, SAF.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


SMIN.L and SAF.PA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMIN.L and SAF.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer