SMHC vs. YANG
SMHC (VanEck China Semiconductor ETF) and YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) are both China Equities funds - SMHC tracks the MarketVector China Semiconductor 25 Index while YANG tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMHC charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for YANG.
Performance
SMHC vs. YANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMHC
- 1D
- -6.17%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YANG
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- 6M
- 42.31%
- YTD
- 29.74%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- -44.24%
- 5Y*
- -33.99%
- 10Y*
- -36.97%
SMHC vs. YANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMHC VanEck China Semiconductor ETF | -15.04% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | -11.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHC and YANG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHC vs. YANG — Risk / Return Rank
SMHC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YANG
SMHC vs. YANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMHC | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMHC vs. YANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMHC drawdown since its inception was -24.16%, smaller than the maximum YANG drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHC and YANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHC | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.16% | -99.98% | +75.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -94.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.16% | -99.97% | +75.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -90.57% | +81.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.17% | — |
Volatility
SMHC vs. YANG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHC | YANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.83% | 59.41% | +21.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.83% | 94.41% | -13.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.83% | 81.86% | -1.03% |
SMHC vs. YANG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YANG's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHC vs. YANG - Dividend Comparison
SMHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHC VanEck China Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 2.84% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMHC and YANG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMHC is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMHC is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.
YANG has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for SMHC.
SMHC tracks MarketVector China Semiconductor 25 Index, while YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SMHC and 1.07% for YANG.
Find the right allocation for SMHC and YANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer