SMHB vs. BRKW
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW).
SMHB and BRKW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMHB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 8, 2018. BRKW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 17, 2025.
Performance
SMHB vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMHB vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | -3.59% | -1.76% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | -6.49% | 2.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMHB achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -6.49% return.
SMHB
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- -3.59%
- 6M
- -13.16%
- 1Y
- -7.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- -5.79%
- 10Y*
- —
BRKW
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- -6.49%
- 6M
- -6.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMHB vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMHB vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank
SMHB
BRKW
SMHB vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHB | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHB | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | -0.32 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHB and BRKW is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SMHB vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison
SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.16%, more than BRKW's 20.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 23.16% | 22.22% | 21.95% | 15.27% | 24.18% | 12.22% | 16.86% | 19.97% | 0.91% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | 20.90% | 14.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMHB vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMHB drawdown since its inception was -90.30%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHB and BRKW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHB | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.30% | -11.86% | -78.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.93% | -9.47% | -37.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.11% | -4.29% | -32.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.25% | — | — |
Volatility
SMHB vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMHB | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.15% | 17.90% | +32.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.97% | 17.90% | +31.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.97% | 17.90% | +49.07% |