PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMHB vs. BRKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMHB vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMHB vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHB achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -6.49% return.


SMHB

1D
-1.24%
1M
-11.01%
YTD
-3.59%
6M
-13.16%
1Y
-7.23%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
-5.79%
10Y*

BRKW

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
-6.49%
6M
-6.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMHB vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMHB vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHB
SMHB Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SMHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHB Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHB Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BRKW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHB vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHBBRKWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.64

SMHB vs. BRKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHBBRKWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

-0.32

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between SMHB and BRKW is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SMHB vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.16%, more than BRKW's 20.90% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SMHB
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B
23.16%22.22%21.95%15.27%24.18%12.22%16.86%19.97%0.91%
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
20.90%14.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SMHB vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHB drawdown since its inception was -90.30%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHB and BRKW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHBBRKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.30%

-11.86%

-78.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.93%

-9.47%

-37.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.11%

-4.29%

-32.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.25%

Volatility

SMHB vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMHBBRKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.15%

17.90%

+32.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.97%

17.90%

+31.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.97%

17.90%

+49.07%