PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
12.49%74.67%66.99%261.41%-85.13%4.53%
3PLT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities
-58.81%173.40%2,483.77%388.04%-99.48%-4.79%
Different Trading Currencies

SMH3.L is traded in USD, while 3PLT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3PLT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH3.L achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than 3PLT.L's -58.81% return.


SMH3.L

1D
18.04%
1M
-10.93%
YTD
12.49%
6M
34.61%
1Y
269.12%
3Y*
82.15%
5Y*
10Y*

3PLT.L

1D
9.28%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
-58.81%
6M
-70.17%
1Y
57.03%
3Y*
348.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMH3.L and 3PLT.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

3PLT.L
3PLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMH3.L3PLT.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

0.35

+2.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

1.65

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.66

0.56

+6.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.41

1.13

+20.27

SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the 3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH3.L and 3PLT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMH3.L3PLT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

0.35

+2.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.14

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between SMH3.L and 3PLT.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMH3.L nor 3PLT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH3.L drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, smaller than the maximum 3PLT.L drawdown of -99.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH3.L and 3PLT.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMH3.L3PLT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.37%

-99.89%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.09%

-83.56%

+40.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.85%

-83.63%

+58.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-84.57%

+34.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.21%

41.68%

-29.47%

Volatility

SMH3.L vs. 3PLT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) is 30.75%, while Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) has a volatility of 34.55%. This indicates that SMH3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3PLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMH3.L3PLT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.75%

34.55%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.92%

109.71%

-41.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.22%

161.93%

-64.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.97%

195.33%

-95.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.97%

195.33%

-95.36%