PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMGIX vs. CMTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMGIX vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMGIX achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than CMTFX's 31.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SMGIX has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 15.02%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.


SMGIX

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.75%
YTD
8.24%
6M
7.49%
1Y
23.57%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
15.02%

CMTFX

1D
0.17%
1M
7.93%
YTD
31.20%
6M
30.04%
1Y
57.93%
3Y*
35.50%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*
25.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMGIX vs. CMTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMGIX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund
8.24%17.35%23.33%32.12%-18.64%24.18%22.21%32.95%-8.95%20.57%
CMTFX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund
31.20%25.10%31.72%56.85%-34.63%23.04%49.65%44.21%-1.26%43.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SMGIX and CMTFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2000

0.84

The correlation between SMGIX and CMTFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMGIX vs. CMTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGIX
SMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CMTFX
CMTFX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CMTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CMTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGIX vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMGIXCMTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

4.16

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.85

14.84

-4.99

SMGIX vs. CMTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the CMTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMGIX and CMTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMGIX vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMGIX drawdown since its inception was -50.62%, smaller than the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGIX and CMTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMGIXCMTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.62%

-68.28%

+17.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-14.35%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-26.63%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.20%

-39.42%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.45%

-39.42%

+6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.75%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-16.27%

+9.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

4.02%

-1.53%

Volatility

SMGIX vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX) is 5.33%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that SMGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMGIXCMTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

11.62%

-6.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

19.35%

-9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

23.46%

-10.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

26.38%

-7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

25.06%

-6.02%

SMGIX vs. CMTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMGIX vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison

SMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than CMTFX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMTFX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund
2.36%3.09%1.02%2.23%3.36%4.19%0.87%2.44%5.89%3.60%0.35%1.74%
SMGIX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund
6.83%7.39%9.69%3.08%10.61%13.70%7.69%5.87%10.17%4.89%0.76%5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMGIX and CMTFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMTFX has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to SMGIX (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMGIX dropped -50.62% vs CMTFX's -68.28%.

CMTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMGIX and CMTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer