PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMGB.L is traded in GBP, while VEVE.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VEVE.AS values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 87.48% return, which is significantly higher than VEVE.AS's 11.94% return.


SMGB.L

1D
5.59%
1M
11.03%
YTD
87.48%
6M
89.61%
1Y
168.08%
3Y*
55.48%
5Y*
38.58%
10Y*

VEVE.AS

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.05%
YTD
11.94%
6M
12.50%
1Y
29.49%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
14.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
87.48%38.79%26.32%66.15%-27.78%44.41%-0.72%
VEVE.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF
11.94%14.01%20.59%17.00%-8.72%23.67%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SMGB.L and VEVE.AS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.69

The correlation between SMGB.L and VEVE.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGB.L
SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VEVE.AS
VEVE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VEVE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMGB.LVEVE.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.52

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.71

4.32

+9.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.80

17.42

+28.38

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.07, which is higher than the VEVE.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMGB.L and VEVE.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, which is greater than VEVE.AS's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and VEVE.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMGB.LVEVE.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.23%

-26.14%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-6.81%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.23%

-19.06%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

-19.06%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.40%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-6.18%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

1.70%

+1.88%

Volatility

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS) at 3.09%. This indicates that SMGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEVE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMGB.LVEVE.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.95%

3.09%

+10.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

7.75%

+17.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.29%

10.63%

+21.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.70%

13.46%

+17.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.40%

17.48%

+12.92%

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VEVE.AS's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMGB.L vs. VEVE.AS - Dividend Comparison

SMGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEVE.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEVE.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF
1.23%1.41%1.46%1.73%2.04%1.43%1.61%1.89%2.28%1.97%1.98%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMGB.L and VEVE.AS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEVE.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEVE.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMGB.L.

SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while VEVE.AS is Global Equities. SMGB.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index, while VEVE.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.12% for VEVE.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMGB.L and VEVE.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer