PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMGB.L is traded in GBP, while SOXL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SOXL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


SMGB.L

1D
-5.12%
1M
11.88%
YTD
75.99%
6M
73.59%
1Y
156.41%
3Y*
54.29%
5Y*
36.84%
10Y*

SOXL.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGB.L
SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXL.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMGB.LSOXL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.25

SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMGB.LSOXL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

Drawdowns

SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMGB.LSOXL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

Volatility

SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMGB.LSOXL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.28%

SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMGB.L vs. SOXL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMGB.L nor SOXL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, SMGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOXL.L.

SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while SOXL.L is Leveraged Equities. SMGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SOXL.L tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.75% for SOXL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMGB.L and SOXL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer