SMGB.L vs. SILG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SMGB.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMGB.L returned 58.17%/yr vs 45.46%/yr for SILG.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.

Performance

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 90.22% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's 5.25% return.

SMGB.L

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: 32.14%
• YTD: 90.22%
• 6M: 89.77%
• 1Y: 183.52%
• 3Y*: 58.17%
• 5Y*: 39.09%
• 10Y*: —

SILG.L

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 5.25%
• 6M: 14.13%
• 1Y: 102.76%
• 3Y*: 45.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	90.22%	38.79%	26.31%	66.17%	-13.82%
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	5.25%	153.98%	13.53%	-6.34%	-8.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SMGB.L and SILG.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022	0.21

Return for Risk

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGB.L

SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

SILG.L

SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMGB.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.92	2.06	+3.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.94	2.49	+3.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	1.31	+0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.28	3.29	+11.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	53.62	8.07	+45.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.92, which is higher than the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMGB.L and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMGB.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.92	2.06	+3.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.67	+0.60

Drawdowns

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and SILG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMGB.L	SILG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.24%	-32.00%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.94%	-30.90%	+18.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.24%	-30.90%	-5.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-24.83%	+24.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.76%	-12.50%	+2.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	12.64%	-9.23%

Volatility

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) is 12.24%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 18.54%. This indicates that SMGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMGB.L	SILG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.24%	18.54%	-6.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.74%	40.08%	-16.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.94%	49.23%	-18.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.43%	39.42%	-8.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.18%	39.42%	-9.24%

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMGB.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMGB.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMGB.L and SILG.L in my portfolio?

SMGB.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMGB.L or SILG.L?

On fees, SMGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMGB.L or SILG.L?

SMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

What is the main difference between SMGB.L and SILG.L?

SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while SILG.L is Silver. SMGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.