SMGB.L vs. REGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) and REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - SMGB.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while REGB.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMGB.L returned 57.16%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for REGB.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REGB.L.

Performance

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 85.49% return, which is significantly higher than REGB.L's 31.29% return.

SMGB.L

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: 17.92%
• YTD: 85.49%
• 6M: 82.97%
• 1Y: 170.23%
• 3Y*: 57.16%
• 5Y*: 38.39%
• 10Y*: —

REGB.L

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -10.32%
• YTD: 31.29%
• 6M: 34.35%
• 1Y: 153.25%
• 3Y*: 3.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	85.49%	38.79%	26.31%	66.17%	-27.49%	19.44%
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	31.29%	75.67%	-34.55%	-22.78%	-22.89%	14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SMGB.L and REGB.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021	0.43

Return for Risk

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGB.L

SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

REGB.L

REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMGB.L	REGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.58	3.58	+1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.70	3.79	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.46	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.46	7.71	+6.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	50.72	20.77	+29.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.58, which is higher than the REGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMGB.L and REGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMGB.L	REGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.58	3.58	+1.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.01	+1.23

Drawdowns

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum REGB.L drawdown of -72.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and REGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMGB.L	REGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.24%	-72.41%	+36.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.94%	-20.93%	+8.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.24%	-60.97%	+24.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.49%	-23.30%	+20.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.75%	-40.12%	+30.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	7.79%	-4.38%

Volatility

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) is 12.41%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) has a volatility of 13.31%. This indicates that SMGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMGB.L	REGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.41%	13.31%	-0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.93%	31.52%	-7.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.96%	45.11%	-14.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.45%	44.61%	-14.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.19%	44.61%	-14.42%

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than REGB.L's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMGB.L vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMGB.L nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMGB.L and REGB.L in my portfolio?

SMGB.L and REGB.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMGB.L or REGB.L?

On fees, SMGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMGB.L or REGB.L?

SMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REGB.L.

What is the main difference between SMGB.L and REGB.L?

SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while REGB.L is Precious Metals. SMGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.59% for REGB.L.