SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) and IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SMGB.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index, while IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMGB.L returned 34.78%/yr vs 6.70%/yr for IUHC.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUHC.L.

Performance

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SMGB.L is traded in GBP, while IUHC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUHC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 67.10% return, which is significantly higher than IUHC.L's 5.44% return.

SMGB.L

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: -13.01%
• 6M: 47.26%
• YTD: 67.10%
• 1Y: 112.28%
• 3Y*: 50.55%
• 5Y*: 34.78%
• 10Y*: —

IUHC.L

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 5.78%
• 6M: 4.02%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 23.53%
• 3Y*: 7.51%
• 5Y*: 6.70%
• 10Y*: 9.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	67.10%	38.79%	26.32%	66.15%	-27.78%	44.41%	-0.72%
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	5.44%	6.55%	3.95%	-3.36%	8.95%	28.79%	-1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SMGB.L and IUHC.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020	0.20

The correlation between SMGB.L and IUHC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMGB.L	IUHC.L
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	100.0%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGB.L

SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

IUHC.L

IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMGB.L	IUHC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	1.44	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	2.14	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.21	2.00	+4.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.08	4.97	+20.11

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMGB.L and IUHC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, which is greater than IUHC.L's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and IUHC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMGB.L	IUHC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.23%	-19.70%	-16.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.98%	-11.71%	-6.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.23%	-19.70%	-16.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.23%	-19.70%	-16.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.98%	-1.84%	-16.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-4.69%	-5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	4.72%	-0.26%

Volatility

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a higher volatility of 16.00% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) at 5.96%. This indicates that SMGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMGB.L	IUHC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.00%	5.96%	+10.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.81%	12.19%	+17.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.01%	16.28%	+19.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.58%	15.39%	+16.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.01%	16.46%	+14.55%

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUHC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMGB.L vs. IUHC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMGB.L nor IUHC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMGB.L and IUHC.L in my portfolio?

SMGB.L and IUHC.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMGB.L or IUHC.L?

On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMGB.L or IUHC.L?

IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMGB.L.

What is the main difference between SMGB.L and IUHC.L?

SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while IUHC.L is Health & Biotech Equities. SMGB.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index, while IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.15% for IUHC.L.