SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L
SMEA.L (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and XS6R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SMEA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while XS6R.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMEA.L returned 10.90%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for XS6R.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMEA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XS6R.L.
Performance
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMEA.L achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than XS6R.L's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SMEA.L has underperformed XS6R.L with an annualized return of 10.90%, while XS6R.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.
SMEA.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
XS6R.L
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 29.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMEA.L iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 9.17% | 25.88% | 3.68% | 13.36% | -3.48% | 16.94% | 2.44% | 19.59% | -9.45% | 14.92% |
XS6R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 14.66% | 38.34% | -1.20% | 11.55% | -3.84% | 1.17% | 18.06% | 22.81% | 3.52% | 13.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMEA.L and XS6R.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SMEA.L and XS6R.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Industrials
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
Healthcare
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Technology
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Basic Materials
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Energy
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Utilities
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
Communication Services
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Real Estate
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMEA.L
XS6R.L
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMEA.L | XS6R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.17 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | 9.02 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMEA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.06%, smaller than the maximum XS6R.L drawdown of -57.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMEA.L and XS6R.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMEA.L | XS6R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.06% | -57.87% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -9.14% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -16.65% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.76% | -21.38% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.56% | -27.10% | -1.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -2.97% | +2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -27.09% | +20.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.22% | -0.27% |
Volatility
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) is 2.93%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that SMEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS6R.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMEA.L | XS6R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 3.31% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 12.85% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 15.02% | -2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 18.40% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 18.96% | -1.95% |
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMEA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XS6R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMEA.L vs. XS6R.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMEA.L nor XS6R.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMEA.L and XS6R.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMEA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMEA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS6R.L.
SMEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XS6R.L is Utilities Equities. SMEA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while XS6R.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMEA.L and 0.20% for XS6R.L.
Find the right allocation for SMEA.L and XS6R.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer