SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L
SMEA.L (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, from iShares and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMEA.L returned 10.22%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMEA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMEA.L achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMEA.L having a 10.22% annualized return and LCPE.L not far behind at 10.16%.
SMEA.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMEA.L iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.71% | 25.88% | 3.68% | 13.36% | -3.48% | 16.94% | 2.44% | 19.63% | -9.48% | 14.91% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMEA.L and LCPE.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, SMEA.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
-
Industrials
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Technology
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Energy
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
-
Communication Services
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMEA.L
LCPE.L
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMEA.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 4.13 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 13.66 | -7.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMEA.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.44 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.04 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 1.20 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.98 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMEA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMEA.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMEA.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -27.05% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -6.66% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.46% | -12.39% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.76% | -12.39% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.48% | -27.05% | -1.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -2.71% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -3.52% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 2.02% | +0.94% |
Volatility
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.91% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMEA.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.81% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 8.48% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 11.29% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 17.74% | -4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 20.60% | -5.56% |
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMEA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMEA.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMEA.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMEA.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMEA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMEA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMEA.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for SMEA.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer