SMEA.L vs. IITU.L
SMEA.L (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SMEA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMEA.L returned 10.22%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMEA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMEA.L achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SMEA.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 10.22%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
SMEA.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMEA.L iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.71% | 25.88% | 3.68% | 13.36% | -3.48% | 16.94% | 2.44% | 19.63% | -9.48% | 14.91% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMEA.L and IITU.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SMEA.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMEA.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SMEA.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
SMEA.L
IITU.L
Healthcare
SMEA.L
IITU.L
-
Technology
SMEA.L
IITU.L
Consumer Defensive
SMEA.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMEA.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
SMEA.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
SMEA.L
IITU.L
Utilities
SMEA.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
SMEA.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
SMEA.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMEA.L
IITU.L
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMEA.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.17 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 8.17 | -1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMEA.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.71 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.16 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 1.28 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.23 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMEA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, roughly equal to the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMEA.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMEA.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -28.03% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -16.76% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.46% | -28.03% | +15.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.76% | -28.03% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.48% | -28.03% | -0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -2.89% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -5.14% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 6.51% | -3.55% |
Volatility
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) is 3.91%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that SMEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMEA.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 7.01% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 14.45% | -4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 19.60% | -7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 21.94% | -8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 21.31% | -6.27% |
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMEA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMEA.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMEA.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMEA.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMEA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMEA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.
SMEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SMEA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMEA.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SMEA.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer