PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMEA.L (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and EQDS.L (iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - SMEA.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while EQDS.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMEA.L returned 10.14%/yr vs 6.53%/yr for EQDS.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMEA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for EQDS.L.

Performance

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMEA.L achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than EQDS.L's 2.43% return.

SMEA.L

1D
0.75%
1M
3.62%
YTD
6.71%
6M
8.81%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
10.22%

EQDS.L

1D
0.54%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.65%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMEA.L
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		6.71%25.88%3.68%13.36%-3.48%16.94%2.44%19.63%-9.48%1.73%
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		2.43%13.04%2.83%8.89%2.95%6.17%-8.39%13.33%-9.12%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SMEA.L and EQDS.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.89

The correlation between SMEA.L and EQDS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SMEA.L
EQDS.L

Financial Services

23.3%
28.6%

Industrials

19.7%
17.4%

Healthcare

13.1%
8.1%

Technology

8.6%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
5.5%

Basic Materials

5.6%
1.7%

Energy

5.4%
4.8%

Utilities

5.1%
10.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
4.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
3.3%

Financial Services

SMEA.L
23.3%
EQDS.L
28.6%

Industrials

SMEA.L
19.7%
EQDS.L
17.4%

Healthcare

SMEA.L
13.1%
EQDS.L
8.1%

Technology

SMEA.L
8.6%
EQDS.L
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

SMEA.L
8.4%
EQDS.L
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SMEA.L
6.3%
EQDS.L
5.5%

Basic Materials

SMEA.L
5.6%
EQDS.L
1.7%

Energy

SMEA.L
5.4%
EQDS.L
4.8%

Utilities

SMEA.L
5.1%
EQDS.L
10.7%

Communication Services

SMEA.L
3.7%
EQDS.L
4.3%

Real Estate

SMEA.L
0.8%
EQDS.L
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

Often compared with SMEA.L:
SMEA.L vs. S600.LSMEA.L vs. MEUD.LSMEA.L vs. IEUSSMEA.L vs. CSPX.LSMEA.L vs. CS51.LSMEA.L vs. SWDA.LSMEA.L vs. EXI1.DE
Often compared with EQDS.L:
EQDS.L vs. VHYL.ASEQDS.L vs. FLXD.LEQDS.L vs. IQQA.DEEQDS.L vs. LDEG.LEQDS.L vs. CB5.LEQDS.L vs. SCHDEQDS.L vs. VYM

Return for Risk

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SMEA.L
SMEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SMEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
EQDS.L
EQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SMEA.LEQDS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.60
0.64

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.29
0.95

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.12

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

0.72

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

2.20

+4.31

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the EQDS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMEA.L and EQDS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SMEA.LEQDS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

0.64

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.52

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.22

+0.38

Drawdowns

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMEA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, smaller than the maximum EQDS.L drawdown of -32.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMEA.L and EQDS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SMEA.LEQDS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.48%

-32.52%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-9.60%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.46%

-10.33%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.76%

-12.74%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.48%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-4.20%

+2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-5.28%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.17%

-0.21%

Volatility

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L) at 3.32%. This indicates that SMEA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SMEA.LEQDS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.32%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

8.67%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

10.95%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.64%

12.56%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

14.79%

+0.25%

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMEA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EQDS.L's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMEA.L vs. EQDS.L - Dividend Comparison

SMEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		0.03%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.05%0.03%0.05%0.05%0.01%
SMEA.L
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SMEA.L and EQDS.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMEA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMEA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for EQDS.L.

SMEA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while EQDS.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMEA.L and 0.28% for EQDS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMEA.L and EQDS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer