SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L
SMEA.L (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and CEUR.L (Amundi MSCI Europe) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMEA.L returned 10.22%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for CEUR.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMEA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for CEUR.L.
Performance
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMEA.L having a 6.71% return and CEUR.L slightly lower at 6.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMEA.L having a 10.22% annualized return and CEUR.L not far behind at 9.88%.
SMEA.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
CEUR.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMEA.L iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.71% | 25.88% | 3.68% | 13.36% | -3.48% | 16.94% | 2.44% | 19.63% | -9.48% | 14.91% |
CEUR.L Amundi MSCI Europe | 6.66% | 24.46% | 4.90% | 12.93% | -5.96% | 17.02% | 2.29% | 19.59% | -9.49% | 14.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMEA.L and CEUR.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SMEA.L and CEUR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.98 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Industrials
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Healthcare
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Technology
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Consumer Defensive
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Consumer Cyclical
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Basic Materials
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Energy
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Utilities
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Communication Services
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Real Estate
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMEA.L
CEUR.L
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMEA.L | CEUR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.74 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 6.06 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMEA.L | CEUR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.54 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.68 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.66 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.56 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMEA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, roughly equal to the maximum CEUR.L drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMEA.L and CEUR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMEA.L | CEUR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -28.63% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -11.05% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.46% | -12.66% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.76% | -17.85% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.48% | -28.63% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -1.52% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -4.58% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.17% | -0.21% |
Volatility
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) is 3.91%, while Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that SMEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMEA.L | CEUR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 4.25% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 10.53% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 12.44% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 13.88% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 14.97% | +0.07% |
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMEA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMEA.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMEA.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SMEA.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMEA.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMEA.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.
Find the right allocation for SMEA.L and CEUR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer