SMDD vs. MVLL
SMDD (ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (-300%) while MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMDD returned -48.94% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. SMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.
Performance
SMDD vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDD achieves a -33.48% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.
SMDD
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -11.19%
- YTD
- -33.48%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- -48.94%
- 3Y*
- -38.20%
- 5Y*
- -29.60%
- 10Y*
- -40.23%
MVLL
- 1D
- 7.14%
- 1M
- 201.84%
- YTD
- 842.68%
- 6M
- 558.01%
- 1Y
- 1,215.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMDD vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMDD ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 | -33.48% | -36.17% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 842.68% | -10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMDD and MVLL is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025 | -0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMDD vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
SMDD
MVLL
SMDD vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMDD | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.63 | -0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 25.11 | -26.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | 52.27 | -53.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMDD | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 9.23 | -10.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | 3.33 | -4.04 |
Drawdowns
SMDD vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDD and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMDD | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -59.02% | -40.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.42% | -48.93% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | 0.00% | -99.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.96% | -22.42% | -70.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.68% | 23.46% | +6.22% |
Volatility
SMDD vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD) is 13.34%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that SMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMDD | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.34% | 60.78% | -47.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.30% | 96.08% | -61.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71% | 133.11% | -86.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.82% | 139.63% | -80.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.34% | 139.63% | -76.29% |
SMDD vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMDD vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
SMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMDD ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 | 7.01% | 4.96% | 4.09% | 3.86% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.51% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMDD and MVLL have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to SMDD (13.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDD dropped -99.99% vs MVLL's -59.02%.
On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs -48.94% for SMDD. On fees, SMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SMDD has been the lower-risk option at 13.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs -48.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
SMDD has the higher dividend yield at 7.01%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.
SMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (-300%), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMDD and 1.50% for MVLL.
MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMDD and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer