SMCY vs. ARMW
SMCY (YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SMCY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
SMCY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCY achieves a -2.66% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 184.82% return.
SMCY
- 1D
- 7.71%
- 1M
- 12.04%
- 6M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -2.66%
- 1Y
- -45.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -27.19%
ARMW
- 1D
- 21.87%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- 6M
- 202.81%
- YTD
- 184.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.27M | $4.47M | $4.19M | |
| $4.45M | $3.57M | $5.92M |
SMCY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | -2.66% | -37.70% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 184.82% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCY and ARMW is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCY vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
SMCY
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMCY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCY drawdown since its inception was -64.75%, which is greater than ARMW's maximum drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCY and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.75% | -56.50% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.07% | -42.68% | -10.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -27.39% | -11.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.56% | — | — |
Volatility
SMCY vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.58% | 98.62% | -23.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.55% | 98.62% | -18.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.55% | 98.62% | -18.07% |
SMCY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
SMCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 165.69%, more than ARMW's 54.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 54.31% | 16.38% | 0.00% |
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | 165.69% | 231.43% | 38.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SMCY.
SMCY has the higher dividend yield at 165.69%, compared with 54.31% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SMCY and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for SMCY and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer