PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (SMBS.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMBS.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than TRIS.L's 1.60% return.


SMBS.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.34%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
1.47%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
1.85%

TRIS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.14%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
2.01%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SMBS.L
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF
0.37%1.02%3.07%-1.87%-0.85%-0.38%-1.19%
TRIS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist
1.60%-2.79%6.84%-0.75%12.57%1.25%-3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SMBS.L and TRIS.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2020

0.74

The correlation between SMBS.L and TRIS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMBS.L
SMBS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SMBS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIS.L
TRIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (SMBS.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMBS.LTRIS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.09

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

2.75

+1.51

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMBS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the TRIS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMBS.L and TRIS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMBS.LTRIS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.76

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.52

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.26

-0.06

Drawdowns

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMBS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.65%, which is greater than TRIS.L's maximum drawdown of -18.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBS.L and TRIS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMBS.LTRIS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.65%

-18.99%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.30%

-4.49%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.46%

-9.71%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.38%

-15.37%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.50%

-5.66%

-6.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-9.81%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.78%

-0.11%

Volatility

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (SMBS.L) is 1.65%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that SMBS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMBS.LTRIS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

2.02%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

4.71%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

6.45%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

8.34%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

8.80%

+1.23%

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMBS.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than TRIS.L's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMBS.L vs. TRIS.L - Dividend Comparison

SMBS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than TRIS.L's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SMBS.L
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF
3.56%3.57%3.50%3.23%2.39%2.22%2.71%3.06%2.99%3.00%1.51%
TRIS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.01%4.26%4.87%4.68%1.52%0.10%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMBS.L and TRIS.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRIS.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRIS.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SMBS.L.

SMBS.L is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while TRIS.L is Government Bonds. SMBS.L tracks Bloomberg US Mortgage Backed Securities Index, while TRIS.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SMBS.L and 0.06% for TRIS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMBS.L and TRIS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer