PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (SMBS.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMBS.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 10.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SMBS.L has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 1.85%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.


SMBS.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.34%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
1.47%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
1.85%

SWDA.L

1D
0.15%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.35%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
13.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMBS.L
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF
0.37%1.02%3.07%-1.87%-0.85%-0.38%0.15%3.04%6.19%-6.73%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.08%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SMBS.L and SWDA.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2016

0.21

The correlation between SMBS.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (5 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMBS.L
SMBS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SMBS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (SMBS.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMBS.LSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.51

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

4.14

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

16.55

-12.30

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMBS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMBS.L and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMBS.LSWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

2.66

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.98

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.96

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.88

-0.68

Drawdowns

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMBS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.65%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBS.L and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMBS.LSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.65%

-25.58%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.30%

-6.55%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.46%

-18.50%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.38%

-18.50%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.65%

-25.58%

+4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.50%

-0.10%

-12.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-3.49%

-7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.64%

+0.03%

Volatility

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (SMBS.L) is 1.65%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that SMBS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMBS.LSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

2.52%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

7.29%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

10.19%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

13.30%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

14.50%

-4.47%

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMBS.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMBS.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

SMBS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SMBS.L
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF
3.56%3.57%3.50%3.23%2.39%2.22%2.71%3.06%2.99%3.00%1.51%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMBS.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SMBS.L.

SMBS.L is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. SMBS.L tracks Bloomberg US Mortgage Backed Securities Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SMBS.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMBS.L and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer