SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO
SMAX.TO (Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and SMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - SMAX.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while SMVP.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index. SMAX.TO is actively managed, while SMVP.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, SMAX.TO returned 44.79% vs 8.99% for SMVP.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SMVP.TO.
Performance
SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMAX.TO achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than SMVP.TO's 5.14% return.
SMAX.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 44.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMVP.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 8.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 18.74% | 16.04% |
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) | 5.14% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMAX.TO and SMVP.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SMAX.TO
SMVP.TO
SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMAX.TO | SMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.16 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.01 | 1.43 | +5.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.02 | 3.40 | +22.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMAX.TO | SMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64 | 0.92 | +2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.32 | 0.39 | +1.93 |
Drawdowns
SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, which is greater than SMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMAX.TO and SMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMAX.TO | SMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -12.11% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -6.44% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -5.31% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -2.60% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 2.71% | -0.98% |
Volatility
SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) at 3.18%. This indicates that SMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMVP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMAX.TO | SMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 3.18% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 7.34% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.36% | 10.07% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 13.14% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 13.14% | +1.47% |
SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMVP.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMAX.TO vs. SMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
SMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.37%, more than SMVP.TO's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 13.37% | 14.67% | 13.88% | 2.57% |
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) | 2.26% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMAX.TO and SMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMAX.TO.
SMAX.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMVP.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SMAX.TO and 0.00% for SMVP.TO.
Find the right allocation for SMAX.TO and SMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer