PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAIX vs. SCVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMAIX vs. SCVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund (SMAIX) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMAIX achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than SCVAX's 16.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SMAIX has underperformed SCVAX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while SCVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.78% annualized return.


SMAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.30%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
1.68%

SCVAX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.94%
YTD
16.22%
6M
15.76%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAIX vs. SCVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMAIX
Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund
1.04%3.62%3.54%3.37%-0.64%0.28%1.13%2.18%1.43%1.20%
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
16.22%1.75%8.22%15.19%-12.13%36.81%1.99%22.20%-14.18%11.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAIX and SCVAX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMAIX vs. SCVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAIX
SMAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SMAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SCVAX
SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAIX vs. SCVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund (SMAIX) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMAIXSCVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.75

1.29

+2.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.71

3.42

+4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.46

10.57

+25.89

SMAIX vs. SCVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMAIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the SCVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMAIX and SCVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMAIXSCVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29

1.66

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.94

0.31

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.78

0.42

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.45

+0.95

Drawdowns

SMAIX vs. SCVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMAIX drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum SCVAX drawdown of -70.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMAIX and SCVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAIXSCVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-70.30%

+68.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.41%

-8.21%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.14%

-26.83%

+25.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.92%

-26.83%

+24.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.92%

-46.64%

+44.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.02%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.15%

-10.61%

+10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

2.66%

-2.57%

Volatility

SMAIX vs. SCVAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund (SMAIX) is 0.27%, while Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that SMAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMAIXSCVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

4.49%

-4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.69%

11.56%

-10.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96%

16.95%

-15.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.13%

20.71%

-19.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

23.23%

-22.28%

SMAIX vs. SCVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAIX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SCVAX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMAIX vs. SCVAX - Dividend Comparison

SMAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than SCVAX's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
5.06%5.88%8.23%0.77%4.33%6.02%0.39%0.48%0.71%0.30%0.04%0.13%
SMAIX
Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund
2.91%3.03%2.84%1.93%0.93%0.48%1.12%1.74%1.42%0.98%0.77%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMAIX and SCVAX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCVAX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SMAIX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMAIX dropped -1.92% vs SCVAX's -70.30%.

SMAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMAIX and SCVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer