SLVR.L vs. COFF.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLVR.L (WisdomTree Silver) and COFF.L (WisdomTree Coffee) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR.L is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while COFF.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Coffee. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVR.L returned 13.51%/yr vs 5.38%/yr for COFF.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVR.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than COFF.L's -24.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVR.L has outperformed COFF.L with an annualized return of 13.51%, while COFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.38% annualized return.

SLVR.L

• 1D: -3.39%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 24.16%
• 1Y: 108.17%
• 3Y*: 42.86%
• 5Y*: 19.09%
• 10Y*: 13.51%

COFF.L

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -9.77%
• YTD: -24.02%
• 6M: -28.50%
• 1Y: -13.30%
• 3Y*: 26.18%
• 5Y*: 18.19%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLVR.L WisdomTree Silver	3.18%	136.72%	20.15%	-2.57%	2.25%	-14.66%	40.61%	13.97%	-10.13%	1.46%
COFF.L WisdomTree Coffee	-24.02%	29.87%	74.91%	24.52%	-20.98%	63.12%	-12.25%	13.69%	-27.12%	-17.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVR.L and COFF.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2007	0.19

Return for Risk

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVR.L

SLVR.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SLVR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SLVR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SLVR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SLVR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 36

COFF.L

COFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 5
COFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
COFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
COFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6
COFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
COFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLVR.L	COFF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	-0.38	+2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	-0.33	+2.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.96	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	-0.40	+3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.79	-0.77	+6.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the COFF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVR.L and COFF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLVR.L	COFF.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	-0.38	+2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.53	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.17	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.04	+0.26

Drawdowns

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVR.L drawdown since its inception was -79.93%, smaller than the maximum COFF.L drawdown of -88.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR.L and COFF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVR.L	COFF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.93%	-88.11%	+8.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.74%	-33.06%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.74%	-33.06%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.74%	-41.94%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.90%	-64.13%	+17.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.69%	-58.09%	+22.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.44%	-58.91%	+9.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.61%	17.22%	+1.39%

Volatility

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a higher volatility of 17.95% compared to WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) at 9.66%. This indicates that SLVR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVR.L	COFF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.95%	9.66%	+8.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.26%	22.08%	+34.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.81%	34.44%	+24.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.81%	34.93%	+1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.96%	31.51%	+0.45%

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLVR.L and COFF.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

SLVR.L vs. COFF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLVR.L nor COFF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVR.L and COFF.L in my portfolio?

SLVR.L and COFF.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLVR.L or COFF.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLVR.L or COFF.L?

SLVR.L and COFF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

What is the main difference between SLVR.L and COFF.L?

SLVR.L is categorized as Silver, while COFF.L is Agricultural Commodities. SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while COFF.L tracks Bloomberg Coffee.