PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVO vs. XAGUSD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SLVO vs. XAGUSD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and Silver Spot Price US Dollar (XAGUSD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVO achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly higher than XAGUSD=X's -19.52% return.


SLVO

1D
-1.56%
1M
-3.21%
6M
-0.08%
YTD
-4.64%
1Y
28.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.05%

XAGUSD=X

1D
0.16%
1M
-7.36%
6M
-26.63%
YTD
-19.52%
1Y
55.98%
3Y*
34.81%
5Y*
17.76%
10Y*
11.01%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.82M$16.45M$13.40M
$32.83M$35.47M$59.31M

SLVO vs. XAGUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SLVO
UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN
-4.64%71.20%0.94%
XAGUSD=X
Silver Spot Price US Dollar
-19.52%148.50%-5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVO and XAGUSD=X is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024

0.82

The correlation between SLVO and XAGUSD=X has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLVO vs. XAGUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLVO
SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

XAGUSD=X
XAGUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XAGUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAGUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAGUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XAGUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAGUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLVO vs. XAGUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and Silver Spot Price US Dollar (XAGUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLVOXAGUSD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.82

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.86

1.56

+2.30

SLVO vs. XAGUSD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the XAGUSD=X Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVO and XAGUSD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLVO vs. XAGUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVO drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, smaller than the maximum XAGUSD=X drawdown of -75.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVO and XAGUSD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVOXAGUSD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.21%

-75.36%

+53.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.21%

-52.52%

+30.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.68%

-50.48%

+31.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-45.06%

+41.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.75%

30.72%

-22.97%

Volatility

SLVO vs. XAGUSD=X - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and Silver Spot Price US Dollar (XAGUSD=X) have volatilities of 10.22% and 10.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVOXAGUSD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.22%

10.11%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.70%

33.42%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.46%

55.99%

-22.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.77%

35.41%

-8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.77%

31.41%

-4.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLVO and XAGUSD=X have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVO has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to XAGUSD=X (10.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVO dropped -22.21% vs XAGUSD=X's -75.36%.

SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVO and XAGUSD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer