SLVAX vs. NQCRX
SLVAX (Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund) and NQCRX (Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SLVAX returned 13.41%/yr vs 14.58%/yr for NQCRX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLVAX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NQCRX.
Performance
SLVAX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVAX achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVAX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 13.41%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.58% annualized return.
SLVAX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
NQCRX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 18.43%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
SLVAX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVAX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund | 15.60% | 27.60% | 12.53% | 5.56% | -1.09% | 26.34% | 6.12% | 26.57% | -12.32% | 18.98% |
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund | 18.43% | 22.44% | 17.74% | 13.76% | -1.07% | 25.38% | -0.27% | 47.63% | -15.47% | 15.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVAX and NQCRX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2006 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SLVAX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVAX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank
SLVAX
NQCRX
SLVAX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund (SLVAX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVAX | NQCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.47 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 5.67 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 20.93 | -4.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVAX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVAX drawdown since its inception was -60.01%, roughly equal to the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVAX and NQCRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVAX | NQCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.01% | -57.85% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -6.07% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.83% | -17.21% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.44% | -17.61% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.50% | -41.84% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -9.98% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 1.64% | +0.57% |
Volatility
SLVAX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund (SLVAX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVAX | NQCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 4.20% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 9.94% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 12.71% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 15.61% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 18.81% | -0.18% |
SLVAX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVAX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison
SLVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than NQCRX's 6.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund | 6.17% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 2.22% | 4.63% | 20.85% | 17.95% | 26.88% | 34.12% | 27.42% | 10.74% | 61.01% |
SLVAX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund | 7.39% | 8.54% | 3.46% | 3.60% | 1.38% | 5.91% | 7.52% | 6.96% | 4.83% | 3.86% | 7.19% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVAX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVAX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to NQCRX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVAX dropped -60.01% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.
SLVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVAX and NQCRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer